IndexValue Assertion: s2md_BV749-1
| Code | s2md_BV749-1 |
|---|---|
| Id | s2md_BV749-1 |
| Severity | WARNING |
| Aspect Model | dimensional |
| Implicit Filtering | true |
| Test | iaf:numeric-equal(iaf:sum(($a, $b, $c, $d, $e)), $f) |
Unsatisfied Message(s)
| Lang | Role/Text |
|---|---|
| en | http://www.xbrl.org/2010/role/message |
| BV749-1: {{S.04.01.01.01,r0020,c0010}}+{{S.04.01.01.01,r0020,c0020}}+{{S.04.01.01.01,r0020,c0040}}+{{S.04.01.01.01,r0020,c0050}}+{{S.04.01.01.01,r0020,c0070}}={{S.05.01.01.01,r0120,c0020}} where ExDimVal({{S.04.01.01.01,r0020,c0010}},BL)=x149 and ExDimVal({{S.04.01.01.01,r0020,c0020}},BL)=x149 and ExDimVal({{S.04.01.01.01,r0020,c0040}},BL)=x149 and ExDimVal({{S.04.01.01.01,r0020,c0050}},BL)=x149 and ExDimVal({{S.04.01.01.01,r0020,c0070}},BL)=x149 | |
| en | http://www.xbrl.org/2010/role/terseMessage |
| BV749-1: {{S.04.01.01.01,r0020,c0010}}+{{S.04.01.01.01,r0020,c0020}}+{{S.04.01.01.01,r0020,c0040}}+{{S.04.01.01.01,r0020,c0050}}+{{S.04.01.01.01,r0020,c0070}}={{S.05.01.01.01,r0120,c0020}} where ExDimVal({{S.04.01.01.01,r0020,c0010}},BL)=x149 and ExDimVal({{S.04.01.01.01,r0020,c0020}},BL)=x149 and ExDimVal({{S.04.01.01.01,r0020,c0040}},BL)=x149 and ExDimVal({{S.04.01.01.01,r0020,c0050}},BL)=x149 and ExDimVal({{S.04.01.01.01,r0020,c0070}},BL)=x149 | |
Label(s)
| Lang | Role/Text |
|---|---|
| en | http://www.xbrl.org/2008/role/label |
| BV749: “Proportional income protection reinsurance" should in general be the same than the total GWP written in the S.05.01 for "Proportional income protection reinsurance" in R0120. One of the reasons for deviation might be the business of the undertaking and EEA branches in non-EEA countries which is not included in this validation. -->Template 1: S.04.01; Template 2: S.05.01; Filter: {S.04.01, z0010}=[s2c_LB:x149]; Expression: {S.04.01, r0020,c0010}+{S.04.01, r0020,c0020}+{S.04.01, r0020,c0040}+{S.04.01, r0020,c0050}+{S.04.01, r0020,c0070}={S.05.01, r0120,c0020} | |
| en | http://www.xbrl.org/2008/role/verboseLabel |
| BV749: “Proportional income protection reinsurance" should in general be the same than the total GWP written in the S.05.01 for "Proportional income protection reinsurance" in R0120. One of the reasons for deviation might be the business of the undertaking and EEA branches in non-EEA countries which is not included in this validation. -->Template 1: S.04.01; Template 2: S.05.01; Filter: {S.04.01, z0010}=[s2c_LB:x149]; Expression: {S.04.01, r0020,c0010}+{S.04.01, r0020,c0020}+{S.04.01, r0020,c0040}+{S.04.01, r0020,c0050}+{S.04.01, r0020,c0070}={S.05.01, r0120,c0020} | |